Tweak
The Formula And Make It Work
It may be possible to write down the key elements of building and
spreading a virus as a mathematical formula. No, I don't think you'll
use it. But understanding the co-efficients makes it far easier to
see what's important and what's not. They also help you see the wide
range of factors that can help an idea go viral; focusing on the most
highly leveraged factor for your idea is a first step in
launching the virus.
Multiply these five factors:
[reputation benefit to powerful sneezer of recommending virus]
[selfish benefit to promiscuous sneezer of recommending virus]
[smoothness of sharing the virus with a friend]
[power of the amplifier used to spread positive word of mouth]
[frequency of interactions among hive members]
Divided by the sum of these two factors:
[number of times you need to expose someone in this hive in order
for the virus to catch]
[number of different sneezers who have to recommend a virus to a given
individual for it to ignite]
And then multiply that by the product of these four factors:
[percentage of infected hive members likely to sneeze]
[number of people the infected sneezer is likely to contact]
[persistence of the virus (how long does a sneezer sneeze?)]
[number of people infected /(divided by) number of people in the hive]
Comments on each component:
[reputation benefit to powerful sneezer of recommending virus]
Powerful sneezers can't be bought. But don't forget
that they are selfishly motivated. Will this make me look
smart? Will it make someone else happy? Will it make the world a better
place? There are plenty of levers that motivate powerful sneezers
to spread the word, and they are often complicated and subtle. Some
of our favorite powerful sneezers: Zagats, Linus Torvald, Paul Newman,
Ruth Reichl, Randall Rothenberg, Andy Hertzfeld, Chuck Close, Spike
Lee, Bill Taylor, Don Peppers, Peter Mayles, Alan Greenspan and Yo-Yo
Ma. You may not know all of these names, and there are plenty of hive-based
sneezers I've never heard of, but what they all have in common is
that they're perceived as insightful and altruistic. Once people think
they can be bought off, their power plummets.
[selfish benefit to promiscuous sneezer of recommending virus]
As we saw in the Amazon affiliate example, if you can make the benefit
to the individual both significant and easy to achieve, people will
respond to it. Amazon signed up hundreds of thousands of affiliates
with a simple offer (get a percentage kickback on everything you recommend)
and backed it up with a two-minute procedure for qualifying and actually
getting started.
[smoothness of sharing the virus with a friend]
Once I want to tell someone about your idea, how do I do it? If it's
got a dumb, hard-to-say name, or an embarrassing implication, I'll
probably pass. On the other hand, Hotmail is smooth indeed, because
every time I send email I'm talking about the idea.
The Polaroid camera used this smoothness brilliantly. After all, the
only reason to take a picture is to show it to other people, and if
you can make the showing (and the waiting) turn into a discussion
of the idea, so much the better.
The beauty of Vindigo is similar. In order to tell you about Vindigo,
I'm going to pull my Palm out of my pocket and show it to you. But
once I show it to you, I'm only one button away from actually giving
it to you. The thing I want to show you is how easy it is to give
you, so the virus self-reinforces.
Ideally, you'll figure out not only what a sneezer should say to someone
when they talk about your idea, you'll also make it easy and automatic
for them to do so.
[power of the amplifier used to spread positive word of mouth]
The mother of a friend of mine was runner up for Miss America in the
early 1960s. I think she lost to Anita Bryant. Alas, coming in second
did very little for her career. Anita, on the other hand, made her
fortune squeezing oranges. Point is that once she conquered that hive
of a few judges, the news was amplified far and wide. And the amplification
(as per Zipf's law) gave her the foundation to create a career.
A challenge in tailoring your ideavirus is to make sure that when
you do conquer an individual or dominate a hive, the good news is
amplified as far as possible, preferably at no cost to you.
[frequency of interactions among hive members]
Some hives (like teenage girls) interact with each other far more
frequently (and with much more intensity) than others--like senior
citizens. By understanding the frequency of hive interaction and then
trying to focus on moments of high interactivity, you can dramatically
increase the velocity of a virus.
Trade shows, for example, bring sneezers together for intense periods
of information exchange. By doing something as simple as handing out
hats with your logo on them, you make it more likely that you'll reinforce
your message during this critical time.
[number of times you need to expose someone in this hive in order
for the virus to catch]
Some viruses are smooth indeed. See them once and you understand them.
It only took one exposure to the Macarena to get it. In general, the
simpler the idea and the lower the risk, the more likely someone is
to get infected. Most of all, though, this variable is driven by how
viral the idea is to begin with. Meaning: is it cool, wonderful, important,
dramatically better and fun?
[number of different sneezers who have to recommend a virus for it
to ignite]
Not all ideas have Medusa qualities. We usually need to hear from
external sources before we're willing to buy into the new thing, especially
for risky ideas. Bestseller lists for books and other products are
terrific, as are the sort of seal-of-approval validations that institutional
sneezers look for. "Hey, if it's good enough for IBM..."
say the more timid prospects.
Bestseller lists are a stand-in for the number of recommendations
you need to decide. A bestseller list says, "There are 24,000
other people who liked this idea." The reviews on Amazon are
another great example of this. When 50 people post a positive review,
it counts for something.
The alternative, which also works, is actually hearing from sneezers
one by one. Some ideas need only one sneezer to get you try it (like
a restaurant) while others might need a hundred (like switching over
to using email or a Palm to run your business).
[percentage of infected hive members likely to sneeze]
Some hives are filled with sneezers. And some ideas make people sneeze
more than others. When John McCain tried to capture his party's presidential
nomination, he discovered an entire population of people, previously
dormant, who were so moved by his candor and campaign finance message
that they started sneezing on his behalf. Not accidentally, many of
these sneezers were in the media, carrying his message far and wide.
Another variable is your ability to increase the likelihood that people
who don't usually sneeze decide that they'll make an exception just
for you. Focus on the time and place of your introduction to the hive.
Want your employees to spread an important new idea among themselves?
Don't introduce it at the Friday afternoon beer blast, but rather
make it a special event. Give them the tools they need to spread the
word. Reward them for doing so, or make it clear how the virus will
dramatically help your company. It's not an afterthought--it's the
core of your marketing campaign.
[number of people the infected sneezer is likely to contact]
This is an especially important metric for promiscuous sneezers. Once
you've converted people into spreading your message for their own
personal gain, how can you incent them to spread the word to a LOT
of their friends? One way to do this is by offering increasing returns
to the sneezer--the more you bring us, the more we give you (but be
careful not to turn sneezers into spammers, who end up proselytizing
strangers and causing a backlash). Referrals.com aims to do this by
turning their best sneezers into super-agents, giving them better
information and more money.
The same reasoning is obviously a factor in choosing which members
of the media to contact. Saul Hansell at the New York Times
has far more reach and influence than Jason Snaggs at the Phoenix
Register. Seems obvious, but what most marketers miss is the
fact that a very small number of powerful sneezers can have an impact
far outside their perceived influence. A reporter with the right
readers could have far more sway over your virus than someone with
plenty of reach but little influence.
[persistence of the virus (how long does a sneezer sneeze?)]
A short-lived experience that leaves no lasting effects is hard to
turn into a virus, especially if it's not a social event like pop
music (does every generation after ours realize just how bad their
pop tunes are?). Tattoos, on the other hand, are extraordinarily persistent,
so even though they're not very smooth, they continue to infect people
for decades, making up what they lack in impact with sheer stick-to-it-ness.
[number of people infected /(divided by) number of people in the hive]
This is about measuring hive dominance. If just a small percentage
of people in your chosen hive have been infected, you really have
your work cut out for you. While you shouldn't compromise the essence
of your idea in order to get a wide platform, you should be super-wary
that you don't start with too small a sample of too large a hive.
It's very easy for your virus to fade before it catches on.
|
Advanced
Riffs On The Eight Variables You Can Tweak In Building Your Virus
In this section, we'll take a look at each of the eight underlying
variables in the ideavirus formula, and try to get a handle on exactly
how you can manipulate them for your product.
No two industries rely on the eight fundamental principles in precisely
the same way. But virtually every ideavirus I've ever seen uses some
of these principles in an extraordinary way, and just about every
one could be improved if it expanded further into the other areas.
The Eight:
- Sneezers
- Hive
- Velocity
- Vector
- Medium
- Smoothness
- Persistence
- Amplifier
Sneezers
As described earlier,
there are two kinds of sneezers: Powerful and Promiscuous. While
all eight elements of the formula are critical, this is the area
where many brand marketers have the most control, and thus the most
influence.
Choose your sneezers--don't let them choose you. By focusing obsessively
on who you're choosing to sneeze on your behalf, you build
the foundation for your virus.
Powerful sneezers are certainly the most seductive, in that the
right word from the right sneezer can make all the difference to
your virus. If David Letterman visits your diner on television,
or the New Yorker writes a twenty-page rave about your
website, or if you win a MacArthur Fellowship Grant, well, you've
really made it.
Oprah Winfrey is quite possibly the most successful sneezer of our
generation. She has single-handledly turned more than a dozen books
into national bestsellers. She has launched a magazine that already
has more than half a million subscribers. She can influence millions
of the most powerful consumers in America, just by uttering a few
sentences.
It's interesting to see how effectively Oprah and her brandmate
Martha Stewart have successfully monetized their position as powerful
sneezers. If they trip and get perceived as promiscuous sneezers,
as sneezers for hire, their effectiveness is quite reduced. But
if they can maintain their position at the same time they sell books
and magazines or sheets and towels, they've effectively leveraged
their fame.
But few of us are that lucky. Most times, you're going to have to
focus on powerful but less influential sneezers--individuals or
organizations that have something to gain by endorsing your idea
but aren't so out there that they're tagged as promiscous sneezers.
Some powerful sneezers are very prominent and thus very hard to
reach. The challenge for most marketers is to find the second tier
of sneezer--the approachable, interested sneezer who can do almost
as much for you as Oprah or Martha, but with whom you have a far
greater chance of making an impact.
The story of The Bridges of Madison County is a great example
of this. Warner Books, the publisher, realized that most other publishers
were doing very little to market to the independent bookstores,
and that if he could court them and give them something to sell
that made them feel special, it would translate into a bestseller.
Of course, as soon as the legions of independent booksellers succeeded
in turning Bridges into a phenomenon, they were assaulted
by dozens of other less imaginative publishers, all trying to rush
in and use the same strategy. Too late. It got cluttered. They got
busy. No one else ever repeated the focused, obvious success of
this approach.
Remember, an ideavirus adores a vacuum, and Bridges filled
that vacuum. As other book marketers rushed in, no one was able
ever again to persuade a critical mass of booksellers to support
just one book.
Does this mean Warner was doomed never to be able to repeat this
process again? Is that all there is--just one new gimmick after
another? No! Instead, Warner needed to gain permission from this
critical sneezer audience and use that permission to promote the
next book and the next through a channel they were clever enough
to build.
Hive
Winning with an ideavirus
begins with the choice of hive. And this choice is so important,
I'd suggest the following: choose your hive first, then
build the idea.
Traditionally, marketers start with a problem, or a factory, and
go from there. I've got a great widget, and now I need a way to
take it to market. Or, we've got this excess plant capacity--let's
find a way to fill it. But that's not what works today. Choose
your market by identifying a hive that has a problem and
has the right concentration of sneezers, the right amplified networking,
the right high velocity of communication and, most of all, an appropriate
vacuum.
Success will come to marketers who attack small but intimate hives.
Yes, Yahoo! and eBay hit huge home runs, but they're remarkable
precisely because success across such a large hive is rare indeed.
We can learn a more relevant lesson from magazines.
Fast Company is one of the fastest-growing (and most profitable)
magazines ever. Why? Well it certainly helps that it's a great magazine.
It also helps that the Internet created a huge demand for this sort
of advertising space. But the real success came in the hive that
the editors selected.
Turns out there are hundreds of thousands of people in mid-sized
to large companies who are eager to do a great job, but feel frustrated
at the slow pace and mind-numbing bureaucracy they face every day.
Until Fast Company, the members of this hive didn't even
know there were others just like them. They didn't have a tool they
could use to reach their peers.
Fast Company became the identity, the bible, the badge
of honor for this new hive. It gave them a way to communicate, to
learn and to have confidence in themselves. By every measure, the
magazine was virusworthy.
Just about every reader of Fast Company became a powerful
sneezer. With no compensation and very little encouragement, they
started signing up co-workers for subscriptions, Xeroxing page after
page of the magazine and passing it around the office. The readers
even created a worldwide network of support groups, meeting in cities
on a monthly basis, with no help at all from the magazine.
Fast Company filled a vacuum. It got viral. It enchanted
and connected with a huge legion of powerful sneezers. All because
the editors chose the right hive and created a virusworthy product.
A few years later, Time Warner launched Real Simple magazine,
inspired by the significant sales of books about simple living.
So they launched a magazine dedicated to simplifying our lives.
Obviously, it's aimed at a very different hive than that of Fast
Company. Alas, the magazine is off to a slow start.
Why?
Because this hive isn't the right one at the right time. Because
there's a real lack of aggressive powerful sneezers. Because the
hive doesn't have a built-in forum for communicating with each other
(it's not office-centric like Fast Company). As a result,
the magazine is having a much harder time going viral.
Choosing your hive
The Zagats Guide to New York City Restaurants is a fascinating
document. According to Zagats, the book is put together by 100,000
reviewers, who ate out an average of four times a week,
spending an average of $40 a person. Do the math. That's more than
$8,000 of mostly after-tax money spent on eating out every year.
This very special hive of people shares a demographic but is by
no means typical of the U.S. population (which in itself is very
different from the world at large). Trying to appeal to everyone
is almost sure to fail, for the simple reason that everyone wants
something different!
The reason there isn't one restaurant in Cincinnati or Indianapolis
or Tallahassee that's as good as the Union Square Café in New York
is not that the population can't afford the tab. There's certainly
enough money in those towns to keep the seats filled in several
restaurants of this ilk. It's simply that the hive that can afford
these restaurants don't have a high velocity way to get the word
out fast enough to keep the restaurateur happy. And it's not clear
that they'd persist. In other words, eating in a New York-style
fancy restaurant probably isn't the way these "out-of-town"
hives choose to spend their time and money. Same's thing true for
a New York hive that wouldn't reward a French restaurant that might
do just great in Paris. All of which is a very fancy way of saying,
"If the hive doesn't want it, you picked the wrong hive."
Selecting
a hive that respects the core value of your virus is a critical
first step in laying the foundation for promoting the idea.
College students want something different from gardeners, who are
quite different from computer geeks. Targeting everyone is a sure
path to failure.
Of course, the real reason you want to pick the right hive is not
because their values match the benefits of your product. It's because
when you pick the right hive (and a small enough hive) you have
a chance of overwhelming it--of pumping so much positive juice into
your digital word of mouth that you really do dominate, that so
many sneezers are recommending you to the rest of the hive that
the majority surrenders and the entire hive converts.
Once your idea starts coursing through a hive again and again and
again, you'll have a piling on effect. People will want to be exposed
to your idea just because everyone else in the hive they respect
is talking about it.
The mistake that's so easy to make is to get greedy as you choose
your hive, to say, "this product is for everyone" or "anyone
can benefit from this idea." Well, there are seven billion
people on the planet, so it's unlikely your comment is correct;
even if it is, there's little chance that a virus would spread across
a hive that big.
Far better to pick smaller hives and conquer them a few at a time.
Far better to identify consumers when they're grouped in bunches
(at a trade show, say, or geographically) and then allow the concentrated
essence of your virus spread to other hives.
Coors did this with beer years ago. You could only get Coors in
Colorado, then you could only get it west of the Mississippi. By
concentrating their marketing dollars, they addressed a smaller
hive. This enabled them to get a larger percentage of the hive to
sample the product. This core group then had a smooth way to spread
the word, and it quickly conquered one state after another.
Without any effort from the Coors people, the virus spread to the
East Coast. Coors fielded thousands of requests from disappointed
drinkers who wanted to try this new beer they'd heard about, but
couldn't.
Coors dominated a hive. Then they went national to try to fulfill
the demand created when their hive spread the word. Unfortunately,
the new hive was so large, it turned out to be difficult to satisfy
and dominate.
Compare the powerful, nearly effortless spread of their idea with
the challenges they face today. As a national brand in a stagnant
market, growth by any method is hard to come by. They built their
company on a unique virus, but they couldn't continue to grow their
company the same way.
Velocity
Napster is a worldwide file sharing database that lets Internet
users share MP3 files. In essence, you can listen to the digital
record collection of millions of other people. The idea behind Napster
turned into a virus and grew like crazy. Why?
They hit college campuses--a hotbed of communication. A virus can
spread across a campus in a matter of hours. When a dear friend
of mine went to Tufts in the late 1970s his roommate started a rumor
that Paul McCartney had died (this was before John Lennon's tragic
death--they weren't that callous). Within an hour, they
started hearing the rumor back--from friends of friends of friends
who couldn't precisely remember where or how they'd heard it.
Napster was spread the same way. How? Because in addition to being
on a college campus, Napster lives on the Internet. So, instead
of being word of mouth as in the Paul McCartney example, it was
digitally augmented word of mouth. On college campuses, everyone
has email, and email is both instantaneous and amplified. You can
send an email to thirty or forty friends as easily as you can write
to one. So once a powerful sneezer had tried the software and confirmed
that it worked as advertised, the word spread fast.
Why is velocity so important? Remember, filling a vacuum is far
easier than going second. If the velocity of a virus isn't fast
enough, a competitor may leapfrog past you into a new hive before
you can get there, dominating as the "original" in that
market.
This happened with beer, in which regional favorites have long survived
the introduction of nationwide refrigerated delivery. It even happened
with the college entrance exams, in which the ACT is favored in
the Midwest, years after the SAT became the standard almost everywhere
else in the world. The only reason this happened is that the ACT
got to the Midwest first.
How does the Net changes our economy so dramatically? Because it
dramatically increases the velocity of viruses in various hives.
Where it used to take weeks or months for a contractor to talk with
suppliers before building an office tower, he can now do it in just
a day using the Net.
This increase in velocity fundamentally changes the dynamic of a
virus. Something newsworthy might have 20 or 30 or 100 cycles of
communications before the issue itself becomes boring. In the days
before the Net, if each cycle only touched one or two or three people,
the virus would die before it got old. Today, these cycles allow
the virus to mutate and evolve as it touches millions of people.
Vector
Richard Dawkins, a brilliant evolutionary theorist, had his own
word for the phenomenon I'm calling ideaviruses: memes.
He pointed out that a meme was like a living organism, surviving
not in the real world, but in our world of ideas.
Like a real organism, memes could live and die, and more important,
they could evolve. Every time a meme is passed from person to person,
it gets touched, changed and--sometimes--improved.
Once a meme has been passed around enough, it ceases to evolve as
quickly and just becomes a building block for future memes. Pop
singers are experts at stringing together memes and turning them
into concise snapshots of our lives. (Paul Simon is a favorite--Graceland,
Kodachrome, the pop charts... you get the idea).
One of the behaviors noticed by Dawkins and practiced by anyone
who markets with ideaviruses is that memes follow a vector. An idea
doesn't spread evenly and nicely through a population. Instead,
people are more likely to send it in one direction instead of another.
At college, there was always someone who knew where the good parties
were (and which ones to avoid). In your town, there's someone who
just seems to have the inside buzz on which restaurants are hot.
On the Internet, some people seem to be on the vector of the latest
email joke, while others--even in the same company or the same cliques--just
don't seem to get touched as often.
When you create an idea and lay the groundwork for it to become
a virus, it pays to study the vector you'd like it to follow. Why?
Because there's plenty you can do to influence its vector, and the
vector you choose will have a lot to do with who "gets"
the virus. The vector controls the hives through which the idea
flows.
If you're on the Net, for example, the barriers you erect will influence
your vector. If your site needs Shockwave and Flash and a high-bandwidth
connection, you're not likely to vector straight into the heart
of the AOL user universe, regardless of where you start. If your
goal is to create a trading card mania among third graders, launching
a series of cards available only at liquor stores isn't going to
enhance the vector, even if you seed the virus by handing the cards
out at the local elementary school.
But this is about more than simple access. Remember, the goal is
to market to people and then get out of the way. So an email joke
(which almost anyone with a job in this country could access at
home, at work or at the library) will still find its vector. How?
There are three factors:
- Who it starts
with. Often, the way we decide which direction to send
an idea is based on where it came from. It's hard, for example,
to bring home a joke from the office. Instead, we're more likely
to send it straight back into the quadrant of life from which
it came.
- Who it resonates
with. An idea has to have impact to be worth sharing
at all, and we're much more likely to share that idea with someone
whom we believe it will impact as well. After all, if we spread
ideas that don't go viral, it hurts our reputation as powerful
sneezers. This encompasses the idea of access... I'm not likely
to spread an idea if the recipient doesn't have the energy or
the technology or the resources to get engaged with it.
- What's easy.
The medium drives the spread of ideas more than you might imagine.
If I have to print something out, put it in an envelope and mail
it to someone, that virus is going to stop right there. That's
why TV and the Internet have proven to be such powerful media
for the spread of viruses--they're easy.
Medium
Scientists wasted hundreds of years looking for the medium by which
light traveled. They knew it was making it through the vacuum of
space, through water and through air, but without a medium, they
couldn't figure out how it worked.
The medium is probably the most overlooked part of ideavirus planning
and construction. It's so obvious, we often don't see it.
In Japan, teenage schoolgirls started and built a craze to billion-dollar
proportions. They continue to line up to use a special kind of photo
booth. Here's how it works: You enter the photo booth (similar to
the old Polaroid ones of our youth), insert a some coins and it
takes your picture.
But, instead of giving you four shots on a strip, it prints out
16 little tiny one-square-inch images on stickers.
Now, what are you going to do with 16 pictures of yourself on stickers?
Obvious--share them with your friends! As a result, every popular
Japanese schoolgirl has an autograph book loaded with dozens or
hundreds of these stickers. Sort of like your high school yearbook
signing ceremony, but on steroids.
A friend of mine, Sam Attenberg, developed and patented this technology
in the States. And while it never became a full-fledged virus in
the U.S., it did develop pockets of intense activity in certain
hives. Some machines were turning $70 an hour in sticker business,
every hour on the hour for weeks at a time. In Japan, two companies
dominate a multi-billion-dollar industry in Sticker Stations.
So what's the medium? It's the person-to-person exchange of stickers.
The medium is the key to the entire virus. Once the first person
got the sheet of stickers, the only way she could use them was by
sharing them with 15 friends. But in sharing them, in using the
medium provided, she had to explain where she got them. Boom. Virus
spreads.
PayPal.com is another example of an extremely virulent idea that
spread because the medium was so powerful. PayPal.com is an online
service that allows customers of eBay--and other auction site--customers
to transfer money online safely and securely. Now, when you pay
for something you buy on eBay, you can just PayPal.com your money
to the person.
Here, the medium is the money. People care a lot about money, and
since, in this case, it solves a time-consuming problem (sending
checks and waiting for them to clear), it's particularly welcome.
And, just as we saw in the Sticker Station example, the act of using
the medium causes us to teach others about the idea.
In both cases, a focus on the medium led to the ultimate success
of the virus.
SMOOTHNESS:
It Would All Be Easy If We Had Gorgons

The goal, of course,
is to have an ideavirus so smooth that once someone is exposed to
it, they are instantly hooked. A virus so powerful that all it takes
is one guitar lick on the radio, one phrase in a book review, one
glimpse of a website and you completely and totally "get it."
And not only do you get it, but you want it. Now and forever.
One of the talents of the great Steve Jobs is that he knows how
to design Medusa-like products. While every Macintosh model has
had flaws (some more than others), most of them have had a sexiness
and a design sensibility that has turned many consumers into instant
converts. Macintosh owners upgrade far more often than most computer
users for precisely this reason. We have to own that new
flat panel display. We must have the new color of iBook.
Vindigo is Medusa-like in the way the virus spreads so smoothly.
It only takes one look at a friend's Palm in order to get hooked
(and one file beaming to get it forever). The Nextel phone has that
power, and so (for some people) does Britney Spears.
Alas, it's not going to happen for you. While you can aspire to
make your product more Medusa-like, it's a mistake to spend all
your time wishing for it to happen. The odds are long indeed, especially
if your product is not groundbreaking. The longer it takes someone
to get the basic concept behind your idea, the less Medusa-like
it is. But often, that's a good thing. Real change, and the profit
that goes with it, often comes from unsettling ideas that significantly
alter the way people interact with each other and with your company.
And those ideas aren't as smooth as some others.
Persistence
In our quest for the quick hit, the easy way to start a business
or just to increase our power as sneezers, there's a real desire
for a shallow virus. A joke. A gimmick. A neat new technology geegaw
that won't be around tomorrow.
Laser pointers are a fine example. I was in a meeting last month
where the presenter used a laser pointer to highlight various things
on his deathly boring Powerpoint slides. Unfortunately for me, not
only was the presentation boring, but he kept aiming the laser at
the TV monitor, which reflected this highly focused electromagnetic
radiation right at my face, hitting me in the eye a few times. I
finally got him to turn the thing off, but not without considerable
struggle.
Other than this unfortunate incident, I can't remember how many
years ago it was that I saw someone actually using one of these
pointers.
What happened was that the pointer came out, and for a few early
adopters, it felt marvelous. It touched a Jungian need in us (especially
men, I think) to have a magic stick that could project our thoughts
on the wall. Of course, the best place to use one was in a meeting
of other nerds. And all the other nerds noticed the laser pointer
and a virus was spread.
But after we all went out and bought laser pointers, we discovered
that they weren't particularly useful. After all, how much information
could one really have to present that we needed a high-tech device
to point out the good stuff from the bad?
So the lasers ended up in a drawer.
In other words, the virus wasn't persistent. Those who resisted
the initial temptation to rush out and buy a laser pointer stopped
being exposed to them, and the virus died off.
Compare this to the Palm virus. Every day, somebody else marches
into your office, declaring their undying love and devotion to his
new pocket wonder. And unlike laser pointers, people who love them
keep using them. They persist.
In Gladwell's terms, the Palm has now tipped in certain hives. So
many people are using it so often that you're constantly reminded
that unless you get one, you're a loser. It's the persistence of
the Palm more than any other viral factor that has led to its success.
Amplifier
Word of mouth by itself isn't enough. As discussed earlier, unamplified
word of mouth dies off too soon to be much good to the average business.
The goal of a marketer creating an ideavirus is to create a system
that allows the positive word of mouth to be amplified (and the
negative to be damped!).
This simple idea is behind the success of Planetfeedback.com. It's
impossible for me to understand why any business invited by Planetfeedback
to participate would hesitate for even a moment before signing up.
If a consumer has a complaint or a compliment about a company, she
can go to Planetfeedback and turn it into a letter to the company.
Then, with a click, she can have a copy of the email go to the relevant
congressmen, media and regulatory agencies. Another click can send
a copy of the letter to the consumer's ten closest friends and co-workers.
Instant amplification.
Now, if your company is the target of a complaint, which course
of action makes sense? You could either proactively grab the opportunity
to stamp out a negative virus, to turn the complainer from an angry
reporter of bad news into a now-satisfied witness to how much your
company cares, or you could ignore them and hope they'll
go away. Of course, they won't go away. They--and the people already
infected--will continue to amplify the message.
Planetfeedback is providing a great service to all parties involved.
By taking previously invisible word of mouth and aggregating it,
they're making it far easier for companies to understand the viruses
that are already being spread, and they're giving them an opportunity
to do something about them. And yes, they are viruses--ideas that
are running amok, being passed from person to person. At the same
time, Planetfeedback gives consumers far more power, and makes it
easier for them to get attention.
Of course, you don't have to sponsor Planetfeedback. Some day they
may offer a different program... or your competitors can pay to
talk to your unhappy customers instead of you.
|