October 26, 2001 Do you think authors should be concerned with WHO is reading and recommending their books, or just be happy that they are being read and talked about?

cleas@earthlink.net
I've been talking about the Franzen case with writer friends --- and maybe it's because I'm a midlevel author as are my buddies --- but I cannot believe his hubris and ungratefulness. Uh, yes, Jonathan, we all want to be considered high art (or at least I do), but that should be a positive judgment that readers (and, ok, some critics) make, an elevating of your work from the pack --- not a negative one you make by saying who should NOT be reading you. Also, it is incredibly insulting to assume that people who watch Oprah (or TV in general) don't read. I graduated from Radcliffe with high honors and I get some of my best ideas from TV. Not to mention some of my favorite entertainment! I wonder if there's some sexism at work here --- you know, those shows are for sentimental, emotional, nonintellectual WOMEN. And I am a 40-year-old woman, so maybe he'd just dismiss me as another TV junkie.

Probably I'm in a snit, because I believe that people --- ANY people --- who read books are inherently smart, and/or often trying to better themselves intellectually, broaden their minds, understand other people's experiences, share someone else's story. I also believe books should appeal to the heart as well as the head. Plus, books --- by way of public libraries at the very least --- are one of the great equalizers in a free and open society. Anyone should be able to learn to read (well, that's the idea behind public education anyway) and everyone should be free to read anything.  To have an author dismiss any potential audience... ugh... the gall of the man!   The good news is that his rudeness and dismissal from the show maybe will open up more outlets for other authors who could use the publicity. There are thousands of great books out there that do not get the attention that "The Corrections" already has. If Franzen doesn't want it, fine.

jd.lewis6@verizon.net
As a writer/author still hoping for that break into the fiction publishing industry (no matter big or small) , I'm thinking how fortunate can this author be? You never hear about an author's struggles before the big book comes.  Well, maybe Jonathan Franzen has lived a privileged existence in the land of fiction and never had to combat the internal flames of self-doubt, after all struggle is a relative term.  But it burns and flickers, "no one will ever read the dreams and aspirations of my characters' lives." I would be grateful for one reader to pick up my novel, open it and view that marvelous world of make believe.  A reader is a reader and a novel is a dream!

DPanzy@aol.com
I think an author should be happy that anyone is reading their book.  Not putting a label on the kind of person who is reading the book.  I had heard rumors about the latest Oprah pick but didn't know how much was true.  I had already bought the book the same day she said it on TV.  Haven't read it yet and really at this time do not even know if I would want to read a book by a person who thinks and says something like that.  I'm just sorry I spent the money on his book.

LJSaveland@aol.com
Yes, I think the author should have an interest in who is acclaiming his/her book.  I think the better the author the more she/he would be concerned with type casting and would want a varied readership and a varied platform of reviews.

MintyFreshKitty@aol.com
I think he should be glad that he is getting recognized. There are a ton of authors out there who are having a hard time getting published or not very popular and this guy's worried about being associated with Oprah? I can think of many things that would be worse.

ATESSL@aol.com
I'm curious about your statement that Franzen "really didn't want the kind of people who read 'Oprah books' reading his. Where did you read this?  I've been trying to get the full interview with Franzen that started this whole hullabaloo, but have been unsuccessful.  Would you share it with us?  The Sarah Brennan link led to a blank page, TBD, I assumed.... And where does Franzen get off being such a total snot about Oprah and the (mostly) women  who read her book selections?  How does he characterize her readers?  And how is he so superior to them and to those authors read by them????? I hate to say I'm enjoying Franzen's book.  I want to dislike it as much as I'm beginning to dislike him.  But maybe I'm just not good enough to read his stuff anyway..... Please let us know the full content of the Franzen interview!

Editor's Note: The editorial by Sarah Brennan can be read at:
here.

RBerton544@aol.com
Maybe the author has read some of Oprah's recommended books in the past. Some were pretty dreadful. House of Sand and Fog comes to mind. If I was an author I would not want to be on Oprah's list of recommended books. Whew! I feel better now.

marysarko@yahoo.com
Oprah's book selections are always best sellers, but I don't know if there are any demographics available on those who buy the Oprah selections.  If it is the case that Franzen is rejecting the Oprah audience per se, then he may well prefer appealing to a different audience.  However, I am not clear if he is rejecting the Oprah audeince or if he is rejecting the Oprah style of reading a text.  He may also want the book to be a best seller on its own merits, not just because Oprah has chosen the text. Whatever the case may be, I don't think authors can completely control the fate of their books once they enter the market.  

tnakens@aol.com
I am certain that Mr. Franzen had little or no information about the demographics of Oprah Winfrey's viewers, and that information matters, apparently, only to him anyway. I feel that women in general are insulted by his behavior and I am now reluctant to read his book.

Echoconcep@aol.com
It's elitist to decide that there are some people worthy of reading a book and others are not.  Who gives a monkey's tail if someone deemed 'unfit' reads something written by any author? If one feels that there are only a selective few with the right to read a book, the author should self-publish and personally hand out copies to those whom he feels are deserving.

Kellmor2@aol.com
The author didn't want Oprah's readers to read his book?  What is that??  I like Oprah, her book club, but there are some of her books that I cannot stand.  What kind of reader does that make me?? I feel that it is his business if he does not want to appear on Oprah's Book Club, I am perfectly fine with that, after all this is a free country.  I have a book club but never had an author appear to our gathering...it is still great.

GeorgiesG@aol.com
If he wants his message out whatever it may be, the more readers he gets the more people under him. I am currently reading the book, I feel it tends to ramble at times but whatever. It certainly is wordy.

DBM6126@aol.com
I believe that the relationship between the writer and the reader is an intimate one. Let's face it, you write because you have something to say.  To speak to no one, is comparable to the tree falling in the forest with no one to hear.  I don't think a writer can, or should, choose who can and cannot read their work.  To do so is far too limiting.

theaerie@skybest.com
Unless harm results from a particular person reading a book, I do not think an author should be concerned with either those who read or those who recommend their work.  By harm, what comes to mind would be a child reading a graphic book.  Oprah has certainly recommended many fine books.  I would not consider a connection with her as being negative.

SCarey77@aol.com
I have always assumed that most authors write for money as the bottom line. Why would they care, unless the tome is a text book, who reads it. If it is a well written book of any genre, it should be able to be read by a vast readership with any taste in reading. Perhaps in the Oprah controversy the fact that most of her books relate to dysfunctional situations is oppressive, but if the book is good, the recommendations cannot hurt the sales.

lisa07110@yahoo.com
I am, by all means, a "reader".  I love fiction/literature.  My favorites include Margaret Atwood and Joyce Carol Oates.  I have worked in the book business for a few years now and consider myself somewhat knowledgeable about books out there, particularly fiction.  When I kept hearing the "buzz" about Jonathen Franzen's "Corrections" I was somewhat curious but didn't take a keen interest.  Then I discovered it was picked by Oprah and my interest was piqued further.  Now allow me to digress here.  I'm tired of hearing all this talk against Oprah's book club.  Simply because more people are reading no matter what or who got them there!  I mean c'mon, she's not telling us to read Danielle Steel (no offense!) or other cheesy romance.  Some of her picks have been wonderful.  I would think there should be no shame but rather further confirmation that the author's book is "good".  Now after hearing that Jonathen Franzen does not want to be associated with Oprah, I simply have labeled him as a snob.  I no longer have any interest in reading his book.  So in answer to your question:  I never supposed that authors were suppose to be so elitist.  Boy bands tailor their music to meet an audience but authors create "art" so to speak , to share their innermost with others.  So I feel an author should welcome all audiences.  Having Oprah's endorsement is not going to tarnish his image, it will simply put his name into many more households.  I suspected  this backlash towards Oprah would eventually happen, that is some author would somehow feel "above" being chosen by a powerful woman who happens to have a majority audience that is female.  I think that I won't be alone in my decision to now have no interest in what Franzen has to say at all.

ERDSX2@aol.com
My local library has a bestseller's club; their computer knows who my favorite authors are (about 30 of them!) and automatically puts me on a waiting list for their new releases when they become available.  One of the options I also signed up for was "Oprah's Book Club" books.  But I have to say that, perhaps due to the state of my life and life in general right now, I have been passing up the Oprah books.  I don't watch her show, and don't usually know much about the books up front, but I read too many consecutive recommendations from her that left me disturbed and depressed.  They might be wonderful writing, (some were, some weren't, in my opinion) but I simply don't need that kind of literature right now.

I have been a bit out of touch with this whole media frenzy surrounding Jonathan Franzen, but from the little I've read, I don't blame him a bit for his reluctance to be categorized as an "Oprah Book."  I'm sure there are many who would disagree with me, but I believe any book in that classification has an instant "reputation."  For most books, that is probably well-fitting and well-deserved.  But for readers like myself, it can also be a turn-off.  I applaud Mr. Franzen for his desire to have his book judged on its own merit, which must be more important to him than seeing his name on a bestseller list.  How rare and refreshing.

WriteDoctr@aol.com
As a freelance editor, trying my hand at the publishing game, I often ask writers why they wrote what they did......Sometimes it's obvious to me, altho' not always to the writer, that the MS serves as a catharsis.  It is my job to figure out if there is a market for the MS.  There is usually something in the MS that a majority of readers can relate to.  May I suggest that if Jonathan Franzen is that particular about who reads his books, then he should pay to have them printed up, run an ad in a local newspaper, have prospective readers fill out an application, and if they pass muster, sell them one....

ENZYREP@aol.com
What an obnoxious, elitist attitude Mr. Franzen has adopted.  It seems to me that an author cannot preserve the right of selective readership when he launches a body of work into the public mainstream.  Why not embrace the possibility of creating new ways of thinking in a reader not already of one's own mindset?  Ideas that reach someone who thinks quite differently than you have a far greater effect and power than those falling upon kindred spirits. Shame on you, Mr. Franzen, for your miserly narrow-mindedness.

DAVENAYMEG@aol.com
"First, he was dismayed at having the "Oprah label" on his book. Then he resisted appearing on her show. Turns out he really didn't want the kind of people who read "Oprah books" reading his."

So WHO is supposed to read his book? What an ass. I feel that there might be more to this, so I should be careful what I say, but for now "What an ass," seems appropriate. I just wonder how his publisher feels. I know that when Oprah puts the word out about a book, it sells millions of copies. Personally, I never buy them, just check them out from the library. Oh well, I will honor his request and NOT waste my time reading it. I have plenty of others on my list to read, and their authors are quite happy about it!!!

VALAITISH@aol.com
Here's an author's response to this week's question: In general, ANY readership is good readership. As an author trying to gain a following I've learned that when anyone reads your book, it's a gift. The danger lies, however, in being typecast by the readership that one draws. There are always certain groups of people that one might not want to be associated with (for instance, white supremacist groups, pedophiles, etc.). So there are exceptions to the notion that any readership is a good readership. Oprah, however, is a kingmaker! If Franzen doesn't want to promote his book on Oprah, I'll gladly take his place!!!!

CBrunetti@aol.com
An author should just be glad people are reading his book. If they are not the kind of people he had invisioned writing for, perhaps he will change them. I bet he didn't mind spending the money his book sales generated.  It may make it difficult to write his next book because the publishers and reviewers will expect him to target the same audience. But once the book struck, it is out of his control.

zaraya@optonline.net
I recently purchased Corrections, but have not yet begun to read it. I bought it because I chose to read literary fiction, rather than romances, thrillers, detective novels or the like. Mr. Franzen has the right to chose how he wants to market his novel. I can understand his reluctance to see the ubiquitous "Oprah" sticker on his book. I have read only one of Oprah's books --- We Were the Mulvaneys --- but I read that one years ago, being a fan of Joyce Carol Oates.  There are books for all levels of readers, and Mr. Franzen fears that once his becomes an Oprah book, its literary reach will be shortened. Obviously he feels that he doesn't want his life's work to be marketed to the 'masses'. He is an author more interested in the meaning of his work than in the financial gains of a popularized novel. I agree with him.

QueenGP@aol.com
I think that the writer of the book should be delighted that people read them and also discuss them.  If I could write a book I would LOVE people to read it.

WREN728@aol.com
I think authors should be happy with anyone reading their books and with anyone that wants to talk about it.  I respect Oprah's pics actually.  And so much publicity comes out of her choices. I think it's a bit odd to only want certain people to read your books.  The more that read, the better the income.

ConnieDonovan@webtv.net
I think that authors should just be happy that their books sell, and not worry about who reads them.  Certainly if a book club picks it up the book will reach a larger audience.  And I think any review of any new book has quite a bit to do with who the book appeals to.  I know I sometimes think I'd love to read a particular author and then after I read the review I change my mind.  Readers, I think, are sometimes stuck in a rut.  And then again, not every book appeals to all the people.  I think for an author to preselect his or her audience is elitism in the highest degree.  And elitism should have no place when it comes to the reading public.

Cranze@aol.com
Hurrah for Jonathan Franzen! Let him stand on his own.

buterfl2@optonline.net
Since who reads is such a diverse population , I feel it is more important that books are read. It is not important who reads the book. If the author would be concerned about the "who," they should include in their forward that this book is only for_____________ and the rest of the population should choose another selection!  What adds to the diversity of our population is the books we read and their impact on our lives.

RSteele124@aol.com
Perhaps the author was not so much concerned about Oprah readers as he was having her name emblazoned on the book covers.  It would suggest an association/endorsement that he might not be comfortable with, certainly since he had no control or input.  Just a thought.

Cairo1953@aol.com
I don't think authors should be concerned with who is reading their books.  The number of books being sold and read would indicate how the public in general viewed their writing. The specific type of reader seems unimportant.  An author should just be grateful with the fact that a "reader" took an interest in their book.  However, it might be nice to know who was recommending their books.

Shell725@aol.com
Gee, I thought authors wrote books so people could read them.  Whether or not Oprah puts her seal of approval on a book, people will read it if the book appeals to them.  Though I have heard of people boycotting Oprah selections, perhaps thinking that the author somehow needed a boost and this was the way to get it.  Regardless, being featured on Oprah would generate a lot of publicity, so I think the author shouldn't be upset by it.  Lots of other authors would love to be in the spotlight.   

MomProvo@aol.com
How arrogant!  I just bought the book but haven't started it yet.  I'm thinking of bringing it back.  Why would you write a book and then be selective about what type of people would read it?  It just boggles my mind.  I think most people that watch Oprah and read the books she suggests are fairly intelligent.  Who knows, maybe this guy has just pulled off this big p.r. coup.  

LAJ6075@aol.com
As if Milton or Moliere or any great author has a choice once they've passed on, as to who will read their works now...Shakespeare wrote for the masses; would he cringe at not only being read but taught or written about? Doubtful...

Writing is validated by the act of reading, not by the caliber of reader.  While I can understand why a writer might not want their output to be affected by commerce, I cannot understand a lack of grace towards those who read (and therefore validate) their work.  Politely saying "no thank you" to public speaking opportunities and to commercial influence during writing is gracious and ethical; whining is neither.  I'm intelligent enough to select a book on its merits and on the merit of its author, regardless of other's approval; frankly, I'm not certain I want to validate the writing of a whiner by reading their work.

SAK24@aol.com
Authors should accept audiences wherever they find them.  Franzen's opinion of the Oprah's book club readers is elitist beyond belief.

ELLENYS@aol.com
I returned my book immediately. I think an author writes a book for all people to read. Oprah's book club is here and in other countries and I think he should have realized that his ideas would have reached many people and caused a lot of discussion

NoelWillis@aol.com
Once the book is published and comes into the public domain, the author has no control over who reads the book.  As a boy in the Midwest in the Depression, I was under close watch by my folks, except that they let me read whatever I chose to. I think an author ought to follow his/her own standards concerning content, but who reads the work; how can the author predict if the work is published by a reputable firm.

GlendaMrle@aol.com
I don't think a writer has a clue about who will read his/her book or what they will get out of it, nor should they try.  The writer tries to create something, perhaps say something fresh, and then it (if it gets published) just gets out there in the air.  People who read the book bring their own experiences and expectations to it - you cannot predict.  It sounds the height of elitism to say you only want "certain kinds" of people to read your work, and not other kinds.  Franzen is uncomfortable with the Oprah label.  I can understand that.  He has an image of her readers and her marketing, and her as a TV icon, and it is not his vision of his book, or how to market it.  No one twisted his arm to accept her book of the month award, did they?  Now he feels bad.  Okay, turn the thing down, take the label off, and move on.

dbelk105@adelphia.net
Obviously, once a book is published the author has little control, and should not have, over who reads or recommends his book. In this case Franzen sounds like a spoiled brat and I for one am sorry I ever heard of or read his book. I detested it and hope it dies a quick death. The book is not worthy of our time or money and only we, the readers, control that, not the author.

SQUIRLYSU@aol.com
There seems to be a bit too much arrogance about who should read his book.  I think he would be thrilled that if his books were a challenge and people had to reach, he could be adding to their education.

Buffisan@aol.com
In response to the question posed, I believe that once an author has published a work, it is no longer a private entity.  For me, that means that whomever reads it has the right to envision, imagine, or enliven the work with his or her own imagination.  What matter is it whether that person is homeless or the CEO of the corporation? What difference could it possibly make, as long as they are literate, and the work touches them in a way that makes it real, even if only for the length of the book? As a fledgling journalist, I truly believe that whether you write smut, fluff, or Pulitzer material the audience is vast and varied.  You do not know the mind of a reader by his or her status in society, race, creed, or religion.  Books open minds to other possibilities.  A true writer would never want to limit the power of their words.

Hyssop7@aol.com
I don't blame him for not wanting his book on Oprah.  She's become a new age egomaniac and her "adoring" fans will listen to anything she says.  The book may be great, but if he wants a different audience, it's his prerogative. God gave us each a free will.  He can disabuse himself of Oprah ~ it's his choice.

SMSEIFR@aol.com
Sounds rather arrogant to me! Does Jonathan Franzen feel that he's so superior that he's above the general reading public? Or is this, perhaps, a publicity ploy on his part? Personally, if I were fortunate enough to be a published writer, I'd be happy that my book was being read. Period!

WritingCandi@aol.com
I sympathize with this particular author's dilemma. Oprah is damn near a world of her own.  To be part of her world is to lose your artistic edge. It takes on hers.  I think he made the right decision, artistically.  No doubt. Financially, he may have come up shorter, but if it's good enough for Oprah, somebody's going to be digging it.  Thumbs ups to Franzen.

Elliphant@aol.com
I think that an author would have a vested interest in who is reading his book, as he was probably writing it with a particular audience in mind.  I am sure Jonathan Franzen did not have the usual readers of Oprah's books in mind when he thought about who would buy and read his books.  I for one have read enough of Oprah's choices to know that I would not pick one out again,  or even be interested. Therefore, for Jonathan Franzen to have the Oprah symbol on the front of his book,  THE CORRECTIONS,  would be a turn off to me.  You are writing to readers of a genre. Oprah is now a genre, if you ask me.

Cipsi2@aol.com
I think an author needs to be aware of who it is that is reading and writing his/her book, and if he isn't happy with the audience, he should probably keep his mouth shut.  He can make corrections with his next novel to reach a snootier audience.

ChikaDDD@aol.com
I only know that the intellectual snobbery he manifests has put me off reading anything he writes. And I don't read Oprah's books, either.

FifiOToole@aol.com
Although I have not heard the whole story on Jonathan Franzen's reasons for his reluctance to have the "Oprah label" on his book, it seems highly absurd to me that any author would be under the delusion that he or she could control who reads a published work. I am going to research this further before making a final decision, but my initial reaction to this issue is to boycott Jonathan Franzen entirely.  There are many excellent writers who would be delighted to have their work published and read by anyone at all and who certainly would be grateful for publicity from Oprah Winfrey.  Unless Mr. Franzen's argument is extremely convincing, I don't know how I shall be able to justify purchasing and reading his book.  I read for enjoyment and fear that I would not be able to enjoy a book by an author who seems to have such a bloated ego.

mi3son@bellsouth.net
I feel authors are to be grateful that people are reading their books.  It helps to make them be known, and it helps them financially.  I do not think Mr. Franzen wants only certain people reading his books.  If that is the case, he should put his head in the sand.  I feel that if he does not want me to read his book, maybe I should not.  I think Oprah has helped a lot of people to pick up a book and let that book take you away to places you might not ever see.  Some of the books that are selected by Oprah are not my type of read,  but I think what she is doing is great.  I love to read a lot.  Reading keeps you young.

Lwslena@aol.com
I believe that the purpose of a book is to entertain any audience that is interested in a particular subject or story.  Magazines target a certain type of audience, therefore it is more concerned with the type of people that may read it.  But many people of different cultures, backgrounds, and interests may all enjoy one particular book.  I feel that he should be grateful that "those kinds of people" find his book worthy of being read and purchased.  I'm sure that isn't the only group of people in the world that are buying his book.  Oprah may not be for everybody, but her views are pretty powerful and will give him lots of FREE national television publicity.  His readers will become his "fans", and one should always take care of their fans; they will provide his paycheck.

Swooman@aol.com
I find it interesting that an author would consider having his/her own book put on an "authors censor list". Is it not the worst thing to consider deciding who can or should read the book that the author writes. The whole purpose seems that books are meant to be read, to be analyzed by some, to be disagreed with by others, to be panned by some, and to be praised by some. The author merely writes with their passion and throws the results of acceptance or non acceptance to the readers.

Now the issues of being "oprahphized" certainly should have been undertaken earlier...it seems the author dragged his feet in deciding exactly what his objections were to being the selection. Actually, it might have been good for him to get the perspectives of the readers he seems to object to having read the book. A good learning experience for him I'm sure...

LCristyn@aol.com
I think it is ridiculous. They obviously have an elitetist attitude, which I cannot stomach...and they should just go with the flow.  Life is too short.  There are many different kinds of people that read "Oprah" books.  And they don't necessarily watch her show to hear about them!   

HSheri629@aol.com
Unfortunately you did not put a review of "The Corrections" in your letter; however, how unhappy the author is after a book is on the market does not seem really important.  The more people that read a book -- the more that get the message an author is trying to relate (hopefully).  It is my belief in this situation we have found a "total snob."  Although, after saying this I must also say that I was surprised to know that the author was not contacted by the Oprah Show prior to the book being placed on their Book of the Month Club selection. This was obviously a complete lack of etiquette in the show's regard.

To finalize and hopefully actually answer your question:  I personally do not believe that usually an author has any (nor should have any) control over who recommends or reads their book.  Of course, it is usual to advertise and promote in areas of the media that relate to the type of book. If a book is promoted by someone unreputable, I feel then there would be cause for concern....but, the Oprah Show....give me a break!  Jonathan Franzen could certainly have done worse.  Much worse!  Freedom of the press.  Freedom of speech.  He had the right to write what he wished, and now he's complaining that someone is talking about it?  Oh, shame; and they're even promoting it.  What will this poor man do? Just my thoughts. Thanks for letting me express them.

Roe402@aol.com
Authors should be happy with a large audience. The more people reading the book, the more likely the target audience will be reached.  Oprah followers consist of various "type" readers.

NanYD@aol.com
You asked whether authors should be concerned who is reading their book or just that people are reading their book?  The question pops into my mind is what is this book about that the author is concerned about who reads it?  And who does he think these people are that read the books Oprah recommends?  I think there is a wide variety of classes of people.  It makes me wonder if sales have been slow and this is a tactic to sell more books because now it has me wondering what the book is about.  I read some of the books Oprah recommends but I can't keep the reading pace and sometimes I like to read other things besides the books she recommends.  I thought that the authors purpose was to either entertain, inform or enlighten their readers.  Now I also wonder what was Jonathan Franzen's purpose in writing this book? People's interests vary and different people gravitate to different types of books for different reasons.

Shameless625@aol.com
I think they should just be happy that they are being read and talked about. If I were an author that's how I would feel.

JLadouc172@aol.com
I was surprised at Mr. Franzen's reaction to being Oprah's pick.  Though I have never read any of his works, it seems to me a person writing "literature" would be delighted at being read by readers of what he considers an unfit genre.  Anytime anyone tries to improve himself, by stepping up the ladder (so to speak) in his choice of books, would please me no end.  I enjoy reading everything from Stephen King to Pilgrims Progress!!  I savor every word and envy the ability these authors have of being able to express themselves in a way others can enjoy. Thank you for the opportunity to express myself!!

Momclg@aol.com
When you publish a book it is to be sold to anyone. Authors should be less concerned with who buys the book and more concerned with the content of the book. Should we now censor who buys a book or who watches a movie???? It has been my experience that publicity good or bad helps sell books and isn't that what the author had in mind when he had the book published --- selling his finished product!

Meenmomx3@aol.com
My first response to your statement about the author of the above mentioned book is "what an elitist pig!"
There are certain people in this world who probably only read the books reviewed in The NY Times Book review. They consider themselves very high brow and the rest of us who read a VARIETY of types of books to be very low brow.  As an avid reader for the past 40 years of both books and the NY Times Book Review I can say 99% of the time the books reviewed there make me say "Who reads this stuff anyway!!!!!?" It is a free country, the last time I checked, and that means anybody, anytime, can read anything they choose.  That includes multimillionaires like Oprah! If Jonathan Frazen would have his way no budding readers or authors would ever be exposed to anything that would inspire them to think of things in a new way! Apparently Mr. Franzen has not heard of the saying "a man's reach must exceed his grasp or what's a heaven for!"

CGBuzz@aol.com
First of all, many thanks for such an outstanding newsletter...done with style, class, and interest.

It's difficult to understand how any writer would be concerned who read his books, if it's geared to a specific area or theme. Yes, understandable you'd want to reach those intended....however, not to want your book read and discussed so openly gives the sense of not caring enough about the intended reader as well.  Newsletters, papers, books and/or any reading materials gives for the interest of anyone to be able to read and discuss creating more interest in a subject or theme. Hearing such a decision would steer me away again from a reader who'd be so bold as to think only the intended should have the priviledge of sharing his thoughts and words.  Such a narrow minded individual would definitely not be promoted or read by me in the future. Thank you for allowing our views to be heard.

KGend15@aol.com
How arrogant can you get? Is this person afraid of being touched by the "common" people? I hope that Oprah and all of her book club members boycott this writer and all subsequent productions. Authors usually write because it is their nature to express themselves, what can possibly touch them if their message has a multilevel meaning for many people instead of just a few?

bookflo@webtv.net
I think any author would be delighted to have his book read by the widest possible audience.  I started to read "Corrections" but could not get into it.  It is too "wordy" for my taste. Can't see what all the commotion is about...

UKHRH@aol.com
Depending on how well known the author is she/he should just be delighted to find a readily available audience?
On the other hand I go OUT of my way to avoid *Oprah* books, too spiritual, too much *sameness* for lack of a better word springing to mind, and too politically correct for this reader. While when her book club first started, the greatest advantage was the introduction of new authors and obviously getting people to read them with her huge following.  Of late, though, she seems to choose authors that make *her* look insightful, intelligent and well-read.  (not suggesting she isn't all of the above) But a true work of popular fiction or historical fiction, both genre's which I *get* the feeling she thinks are beneath her, can be just as satisfying; and what's wrong with a fiction book which may already hold a wide audience in which the reader can lose themselves and escape from reality?

I suppose my biggest grip would be her *total* neglect of historical fiction by such authors as Sharon Kay Penman, Elizabeth Chadwick, Margaret George, etc., as if they are linked too closely with romance novels when in fact they are another genre completely.  It also offers the reader the opportunity to get their feet wet in the study of *real* history. Guess those are my ramblings for the day!

Audup@aol.com
That's very interesting that there is an author who doesn't want his book on the Oprah list.  I can heartily agree with him for although her list has, I'm sure, many advocates, I personally will not read a book endorsed by her.
I do not care for her nor her hype and so I feel that her endorsement would indicate a type of reading that would not interest me. Since he does not want his book to be grouped with this list, I find that I am more than likely going to read it. Yes, I think he has the right to say "I do not want my 'creation' to be included ".

NERAK0154@aol.com
I am rather insulted by this author -  what does he mean, the type of people who read Oprah's books.  I don't usually read what "her" books are, but I truly admire what she has done for bringing back reading to this country.  Books clubs have sprung up all over and people are READING.  So, I guess if he is discriminating over who reads his works, maybe he should consider not publishing.

JINXE24@aol.com
What a shameful remark was made by the author about "Oprah Books".  He should be delighted to be approved by anyone, especially Oprah Winfrey.  Now, I wouldn't buy his book just because of his (racist,sexist ?) attitude.  Franzen ought to be ashamed of himself.   

DCCJ1@aol.com
I think authors should write for their own satisfaction.  Fame (lasting or not) and fortune will come if they are good.

JohnPLaura@aol.com
I usually love the Oprah picks.  I think it is great that she is bringing unknown authors to our awareness.  I have read several of her picks, and been so grateful to learn about a book I otherwise would never have chosen to read.  However, The Corrections was one of the worst books I have ever read in my life. I could not even finish it.  Mr. Franzen should be VERY happy that Oprah put her name on his book, for if she had not, I sure would never have called a dozen bookstores to locate the book, then spent 20 odd dollars for a book suitable only for lining a hamster cage. He seems very ungrateful.

RLAUBRG@aol.com
J. Franzen is an IDIOT!

Rhodavictor@aol.com
I believe Mr. Franzen should be concerned about the number of people who read his book because this reflects the number of sales and income received.  However, I don't believe it is his place to decide who should read his book once it has been published.  If he truly feels this way then he should not have offered it for publication.  Perhaps Mr. Franzen meant to say receiving Oprah's stamp of approval implies a book is excellent and should be read by all when there are a lot of books on the market that are very good but aren't recognized by Oprah which is unfortunate.  If this is what he meant he should have appeared on the show and raised this issue.

TootsiePie@aol.com
I am confused.  Who exactly are Oprah readers?  I personally can not presume to identify who would or would not read a book recommended by Oprah.  Any ideas?

FIRE195O@aol.com
Interesting question, because that subject came up recently. One author was afraid of his book being recommended by Oprah. I'd never thought of that but it is worth investigating I suppose.   Case in point, I never read what Oprah recommends because the books all tend to be subjects which are of no interest to me for various reasons.  BUT writers need to remember that most serious readers don't usually pay attention to reviews anyway.  Most of us are word of mouth readers or make our own decisions about what we read. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.

Joyceclk@aol.com
He wrote it - he can say and do what he wants regarding it.

bluhrig@inct.net
It seems arrogant for an author to dismiss a sector of the reading public that is interested in reading his book.  Are Oprah watchers beneath contempt?  Doesn't he want to make money from his writing? If writing is communicating, why cut off the chance for more people to learn about your book?

CMSivula@aol.com
Yes, I feel that an author should be concerned about what audience he is reaching.  I feel the same about the television and movie producers. Maybe if we were to have a few less books/movies/television shows detailing how terrorists act and the types of terror being invoked on this society, we would have fewer Bin-Laden's and certainly fewer of his followers and "copycats".   It seems that every time there is a new "thriller" out, someone who has been fascinated by the book tries to imitate the art.  In some cases, life is imitated by the art, but this only perpetuates the desire to repeat the "act" and possibly "do it" better or get by without making the "same mistakes".

Imagine if the authors of today would not write about the crimes and terror that can be inflicted upon people but instead about the good works that could be done or at least the good works that are being done. Yes, there will always be violence in society, there has been since Cain and Abel.  Do we have to be so graphic in our descriptions and provide step by step instructions to everyone knowing that someone out there will take this book literally and try to duplicate its story?

CMalott@aol.com
I guess that my answer to your question depends on the writer's purpose. If the author wrote for the sole purpose of being published or to beat a deadline, I suppose they might not care who reads their books. However, those scenarios would have to be phenomena. Most authors surely wish to have their tomes read by as many people as possible. If that's the case, then being promoted by Oprah would have to be a boon to increasing sales. Why in the world would someone be against that? It's not as if Oprah is pushing an uncomfortable political agenda. She is, and should continue to be, commended for her efforts at increasing literacy and the author who complained should be generally chided for his/her apparent arrogance.

Vahudginsvb@aol.com
This man, Jonathan Franzen, must be a quintessential snob.

DesertGma@aol.com
Sounds arrogant to me.  Is he presuming he has some sort of image that will be harmed by his book being an Oprah selection?  Most authors would kill for that kind of exposure and the resultant financial gain.

Jgerr@aol.com
If an author can afford it, does not need to sell books to everyone possible, I do think an author should be picky about who reads a book.  (Many may read and not even understand). Yes, an author should write for a particular audience and stick to it.

PhotoRoz@aol.com
Yes, an author has the right to be concerned who's reading his book if his aim has been to write for a more scholarly audience than he believes to be attracted by the Oprah label. It's possible, of course, that 1) he's underestimating the intellect of Oprah's readers, 2) he's getting more exposure by declining Oprah's invitation than if he had been on her show, and 3) if he's as good as he thinks he is,  his book will reach the audience it deserves in spite of the Oprah sanction.

CRESINE@aol.com
I feel that authors of fiction in particular should be happy that anyone is reading their work. To judge the "Oprah" book club readers as below his standard is arrogant and as far as I'm concerned narrow minded. Perhaps Mr. Franzen considers himself and his work too superior for the common folk and his vision as an "Artiste" above our intelligence. I myself do not consider Ms. Winfrey's selections to be the "gospel" though in fairness many of her choices have been excellent. Perhaps Mr. Franzen should frown upon the Oprah logo on his cover and since he feels so strongly should include his own disclaimer on the cover......"this book is intended for only the righteous psuedo intellects and not for the average reader, Mensa membership required"!!!!!!!!!!!

BAP3492@aol.com
Regarding book recommendations: It is my feeling that the person who is recommending a book on T.V. should discuss this recommendation with the author because it takes on a more formal act. I believe that this kind of recommendation is different from a person recommendations of a book to a friend.

ARomano895@aol.com
Authors should only be concerned about how well the book is selling-- did it make the TOP TEN in best seller listing --- who gives a damn WHO the readers are? HOWEVER I do agree with the decision NOT to appear on Oprah.

JEarh13191@aol.com
Just be happy that they are getting published without having to resort to a vanity press!

Helena1010@aol.com
I find it rather unusual for an author to print a book in mass production, then be concerned with the "type" of people who might be reading it.  Be assured I will not waste my time reading his novel.

MOMACALADA@aol.com
I am totally supportive of Franzen.  I don't think he rejects her readers per se.  I just think that putting her label on the book signals that it is aimed at a kind of middle-brow sentimental reader and would, therefore, be a signal to a more high-minded reader that this is not a book for them. I don't think that's so much snobbism...it's just that Oprah is annoying in her choices to many readers.  Her choices, both in her programming and in her books and magazine are off-putting.  Frankly, if I want 12-step programming and reading I will find a 12-step group of my own.  I find her program totally unwatchable and I find her book choices boring!!!

Havanablue@aol.com
It is such a scary proposition to pour your heart into a book and then put it out there for the public to see, I believe authors should mostly just be happy that their books are being read and talked about amongst the friends of someone who has read the book.  After all, once the book goes to press the authors can't control who has access to it, so why should an author stress over something they cannot control.

SteLevey@aol.com
If my book were published, I would be only too thrilled to know that anyone was reading it and that it was good enough to be recommended on such a large scale.  The author sounds too blase to me.  I should only have such luck with my novel.

malaniek@netzero.net
No, I don't.  I think the author should just be happy that his book is being talked about and read.  Especially if his book is being opened up to a whole new audience.  He could dramatically increase his number of current readers to include ones that might not necessarily pick up one of his books.

Dotcu@aol.com
Personally, if that author doesn't want to be an Oprah book club selection, he should have said so when asked. Since he made such an issue of not now being a selected author, I will abide by his wishes and NOT buy or read his books.

smb341@prodigy.net
I suppose authors should be happy just to be read; but at the same time I understand Mr. Franzen's concern at his book being chosen by Oprah for her book club. I've not read all the books she recommends, but those I have read I found depressing. So I imagine Mr. Franzen would be concerned that people who think as I do would pass on his book.

Tsauv485830224@aol.com
I believe that any author who prefers "choosing" his readers is, indeed, "weird" --- or not to hurt their feelings, perhaps I could equate them as being "eccentric"!  Who do they think are typical "Oprah" viewers?  They  eminate from all walks of life, from the young, intelligent mothers, to professional women and men, including doctors, lawyers, university professors, etc.  The Oprah Club members choose books that have high literary value, not only because the story itself is interesting.  I, myself, am a  retired  Librarian.  I have not always  approved of all the books chosen by The Oprah Club but it was not because the books lacked literary merit but because the plot just did not interest me.  Jonathan Franzen should sit sometime with half a dozen of Oprah Club readers and see if they can or ...
Editorial note: the text of the email ended here, unfortunately.

SIOBUDJ@aol.com
If the author writes his book for public consumption, how can he expect to choose his readers?  Maybe nobody will read it!!!!!!

Tami4kids@aol.com
I feel that authors should be gratified that someone wants to read, and more importantly recommend their books. After all, even if they don't 'approve' of the type of people doing the recommending, they are getting their 'story' out to a wider audience. As someone who would love to be able to write well, I would want anyone who was interested reading my work, even if only to know that someone took the time from their lives to do so.

LorynK@aol.com
I am appalled that Franzen thinks he can choose his readers. I find that very obnoxious and self-serving. I find nothing wrong with myself as an Oprah reader. While I don't always agree with her selections, I read them and find myself enlightened as a result. He really blew it and I hope he realizes it. In fact, I am in the middle of the book (hoping it gets better actually) and find that he seems to be just like one of his characters (not a favorable thing). Since I have a personal habit of never stopping a book midway, I am going to finish although I don't feel the author now deserves my readership. So glad I did not buy the book and instead got it from the library. Hope his comments truly backfire.

YCSpeedy@aol.com
I feel that an author shouldn't really be concerned about who is reading the book, just so long as someone is reading it.  A diverse audience captures the majority.

JudgePattyB@aol.com
I don't know this author's work and I'm not too wild about the generic Oprah book. But, it seems to me this guy is a snob of the worst sort. I've always assumed that people who write are people who love to read and people who truly love to read don't automatically exclude anything, just because it is on a "list" they haven't been knocked out by. In fact, I don't believe it when he says he doesn't want to be on her list. I assume he thinks his own work is worthwhile and therefore he should believe that if people read it because it is on Oprah's list, they will be elevated, no matter how culturally deprived they are. Please publish the results of the survey --- if this author has an agent, he's either getting bad advice or not listening to good advice.

Bicx@aol.com
I think J. Franzen has an enormous nerve to say no to Oprah. Surely he was notified that he was picked and should have stopped it right there.  No writer has the right to decide who should be reading his/her book. I read it and found it very depressing but, once into it, I wanted to see how it ended which is why one keeps going on most books but his arrogance with the Oprah show galls me.  Thanks for listening!

User116712@aol.com
Is it fashionable these days to poo poo having people read and discuss your ideas.? If so why put pen to paper? In the words of the old cliche --- Methinks the gentlemen doth protest too much.

Wcpainter@aol.com
As an artist, I would object to my work product being labeled, but I would have checked the fine print before accepting the proposal. The whole issue does raise some interesting questions tho:  
Is a book only worth recommending and reading if the author agrees to Oprah's conditions? Is it not as good a book today as it was a few weeks ago? Do we know how many other authors may have turned her down? Would we even be having this discussion, if the person who wanted to publicize and affix their label to The Corrections had been, say, Bill Maher? or Howard Stern?

jennysnell@netspeed.com.au
Read with interest of Jonathan Franzen and his dismay at having been selected for Oprah's Bookclub. There appears to be a stigma attached to inclusion in this list. To comment that he prefers not to have the kind of people who read "Oprah books" reading his, makes me a little puzzled as I personally have enjoyed some of those selections however I do read a wide range of books as I like variety in my reading.  I would think any recommendation or publicity from whatever source would be welcomed by any author. I look forward to reading everyone else's thoughts on this one.

I would like to take this opportunity to say thank you for this very informative and inquiring newsletter that comes to me each week. I enjoy the way the newsletter broadens my reading experience with the excellent reviews and the opportunities for the readers to post their thoughts and feedback to the articles.

nankm@juno.com
If they have a message they want to give to the world why do they care who promotes its?  It might reach some readers through Ophra they would never reach otherwise.    

Alexia7290@aol.com
If the book is for general audiences, I don't feel the author needs to be concerned with who is reading and recommending their books.  But, if the books contain adult subject matter, sensitive topics, or "how to" information on subjects like guns, bombs, drugs, and anything of that sort, there should be a definite warning on them.  I hate to dive into censorship, but I've seen and heard about some books that should NOT be read by individuals under 18 (i.e. how to make bombs).  Yet, young teens and even pre-teens seem to have no problem getting a hold of them.  As a writer, I would not want children reading anything I've written if I feel it is for adult audiences only.  Otherwise, the more you can read, the better.

AnnMTrip@aol.com
I think Franzen should be happy that anyone buys his book when so many authors would love to be published.  How arrogant of him to not want "Oprah's audience" to read his book.  I won't buy it.

Bettys1870@aol.com
Yes, Franzen wrote this book for a particular audience.  If he does not reach this audience, he has failed.  Perhaps he will reach his target audience as well as the Oprah audience; however, to some people, the Oprah tag is a "kiss of death."

FAbrod111@aol.com
I believe that authors should be happy that they have an audience that reads their material, rather than focusing on a select group. Focusing on a select group could eventually lead to low sales and no one wanting to expend the monies needed to publish the books.

Angel4rr@aol.com
Let's face it, an author's goal is to make money.  Mr. Franzen appears to be extremely judgmental and apparently is under the impression he is above or somehow superior to anyone who would respect Oprah's recommendations.  He does not deserve to be on her show and I, for one, would not spend money on anything he has written.  Why would he think that anyone would be so inclined to spend money on his book when he's got that type of attitude towards others?  As long as someone is buying an author's book and they are reaping the financial proceeds, who cares who is buying the book?  After this you can be sure he will have lost at least one potential sale.  I briefly considered reading his book, until I heard of his pretentious, self-serving attitude.  No thanks.

Linpeace1@aol.com
Integrity is always in style.

GRAMANIK2001@aol.com
I can't believe this man is so conceited and self-centered that he wants to choose who should or should not be reading his book.  Why did he bother to have it published if he only wanted "certain" people to read it?  I bought the book on Oprah's recommendation and am know considering whether or not to return it to the store. I am not worried about Oprah's feelings, she can hold her own with anyone, I just don't understand his objections to her recommendation.

LadyVolz@aol.com
Concerned about the type of people who read Oprah books?  How stupid.  I read an occasional Oprah book; am I not the kind of person he wants to read his book?  Just exactly WHAT kind of person does he want?  Can he describe that person?  I am truly curious now.  I didn't realize we were "Types".  I read mainly Mystery/Thriller with a side of general fiction and biography.  I read obsessively, have bought hundreds of HB books and still buy them.  Since he has "typed" me now because I have read an occasional Oprah book, I guess I will forgo the purchase of The Corrections. (Personally I think he is making a mountain out of a molehill.)

ldsnes@bellsouth.net
Just be happy they are being read and talked about.  If he didn't want certain types of people to read his book (ie The Corrections) he shouldn't have published it, just passed it out to those who meet his criteria of satisfactory readers.

KEJMRD2@aol.com
Once a book is published the author doesn't have a say in who reads it !!

katrina_h@productivity.org
The whole point of a book being published is so everybody can see it and read it (if they wanted to). Therefore, authors should not be concerned about who reads and/or recommends their books. If an author did do it that way, chances are, I'm not going to read that author's books.

LMFranco@aol.com
I think authors should be glad their books are being read, period.  What snobbery to not want "Oprah's people" reading his books!  

burnisetuck@yahoo.com
I think authors should generally be overwhelmingly grateful for any and all readers of their books, even those they think on first thought wouldn't want to or wouldn't be able to appreciate the book sufficiently. Who knows what individual readers get out of books?  Almost all writers, if they're in their right minds, want to be read.  Of course, they want to be understood and be appreciated for what they are trying to convey.  I think an author's only concern in this area should be with people who willingly and purposefully misrepresent what the author intends.  In the present case, my limited impression of Oprah and "her" books is that she is a serious reader, and that she picks books of quality.  Maybe the books she picks are "middlebrow", but my impression is that she reads and enjoys Toni Morrison among others, whom Franzen shouldn't mind being in company with, I would think.  So, my question for, and advice to, Mr. Franzen is: what's the problem?  Count your blessings.  OK, maybe the unwashed masses won't get all your nuances and maybe your rep will even suffer in the higher Book Chat reaches a little.  So what!  Enjoy the acclaim, the extra income, exchange ideas with Oprah, and don't let it influence what you write next a whit...

Renger@aol.com
Well, whoop-de-do.  So author Franzen doesn't want the kind of people who read Oprah books to read his.  How can he generalize about Oprah readers?  I started to read Oprah books and got bogged down in books about dysfunctional families.  Many of them I don't read.  Many I do.  Were I an author, though, I'd think some about converting more readers to my way of writing or thinking.  Seems to me, Oprah just might do that.  For whom did he write his book?  I haven't read it, but I am not so narrow-minded as to avoid it despite the arrogance of its author or wherever it's publicized.

flatiron_98@yahoo.com
I recently heard the question asked to Joyce Carol Oates on a cable tv station regarding her book "We Are The Mulvaneys" being selected as an Oprah book. Ms. Oates commented that the selection as an Oprah book widened the audience that now reads this book and other books that she has written or will write. Isn't this what an author really wants? Also, why not make money at the same time so that you can afford to entertain the readers again with new books and pay your bills too?

EZN1@aol.com
Whether authors "should" be concerned about who is reading their books is somewhat beside the point. If you spend seven years of your life writing a novel I think you're entitled to hope to reach a particular audience.  I admire J. Franzen for being honest enough (and financially disinterested enough, frankly) to shun the Oprah juggernaut. Not that I have anything against her book club. I'm glad she's promoting reading. And I'm glad she's promoting a book that's more complicated, ironic and literary than many of the female-victim-triumphs-over-despicable-life-circumstances that she has chosen in the past. Jonathan Franzen can think anything he wants to about it.

MoM3g2b@aol.com
Oprah has introduced 'many' nonreaders to our passion.  Congrats to Oprah --- and Mr. Franzen has a nerve with his attitude.  I was halfway through his novel and I would have read it without the recommendation. Now I will not read it and even would love to return it. I will donate it to the library.

bez18@earthlink.net
Is Franzen crazy?  Authors should put their work out there and HOPE people will read it --- not be concerned about WHICH people will be reading it.  I think this author is nuts!

LKornman@aol.com
My information was that when F. found out what the endorsement by Oprah meant, he recanted; but she said, too late.  I hope that version is correct.  How egotistical of any author to try to limit his audience.  

TheLiteraryDog@aol.com
What kind of author writes for a particular audience ? An author who has his head in the sand!!  Readers are readers; they come from all walks of life. If an author is going to write for a group of people, he or she should write trade magazine articles, something along the lines of medical articles, or perhaps pet care ( sorry, couldn't resist that one ) but not general fiction. Fiction is for the masses. As for the author of The Corrections, I think he needs to issue a real corrected press release, and an apology to anyone who bought or read his book. As for the publisher, I really feel sorry for them if he's under contract for more books. Do the words " Sale Table " apply ?

Ginnylazar@aol.com
I can only understand an author's concern about who his or her readers are if the book's intended audience is missing from among its identified readers. If this is the case, then perhaps the publicity or the book itself is skewed in the wrong direction. In this case, Mr. Franzen's attitude comes across as arrogance or insecurity masked by arrogance. Are Oprah's readers not classy or intellectual enough? Perhaps it is insulting to think that mainstream America can understand something conceived for intellectuals. Perhaps Mr. Franzen fears that his work will not be taken as seriously as he feels it should be now that it has been popularized. How unfortunate, that he'll get all these unwanted royalties! Poor guy!

SARLIS@aol.com
I think that once an author signs a contract to publish a book, that author has basically given the right to the reading public to determine who is reading and talking about the book. It must feel a bit like selling a part of yourself. However, I do feel strongly that any author reserves the right, by legal contract, to exclude any "endorsement."

pnichols@woodruffelectric.com
Both - they are probably interested in who, maybe for reviews and the audience they are reaching; but not to the exclusion of writing because they love to and not just trying to impress reviewers.  If a writer writes what he loves and is interested in, he/she will have a following and they will want to know that.  A writer shouldn't try to write just for money or publicity, but should want to write to share something with the reader and be fulfilled by knowing they have reached someone.

annie.haynes@netxv.net
I believe that the majority of writers do what they do for themselves, not so much for their "audience".  A devoted readership and financial security provide encouragement and perhaps more time to practice the writers' craft, and I think most authors are glad to have these advantages, but I don't think that "who is reading this?" is often even a consideration.

HodgsonA@prodigy.net
Interesting question.  I have never thought of that from the author's point of view.  I am one of the co-founders of a book group that has been together for over 20 years. We have 10 members. We read a variety of books: classics, nonfiction, fiction, autobiography, best sellers, etc.  As a rule, we have not read or recommended very many of Oprah's books. We have read 2 of her books: Poisonwood Bible, which we picked out before Oprah picked it, and we did enjoy it; and the White Oleander, which we did feel was well written. We have felt that many of her books have a dark subject matter, which can make great discussions.  We desire to pick out books that have merit on their own and not because Oprah recommended it.

I can understand why an author would desire to have a book he/she wrote stand on its own merit and not be popular because Oprah picked it for her Book of the Month (like The Red Tent).  I would hope being an Oprah book would not influence if the book receives or doesn't receive any awards. I plan to read The Corrections based on reviews I have heard not because it is an Oprah book.  Just because someone reads Oprah's books most of the time doesn't mean they are different than me.  I am curious what kind of reader does Jonathan Franzen hope will read his book?  

mary.donlin@dpw.com
I feel two ways about this question:  1) Yes, I think an author should be glad people want to read him/her at all.  If the literary style is above their level of perception, that's up to them to decide.  2) I've long felt that many of us are capable of making our own good reading choices without Oprah telling us what to read.  I actually feel insulted if a friend sees the Oprah sticker on my book & assumes the only reason I'm reading it is because Oprah says so.  I have a mind of my own and am able to choose what to read.  However, I do applaud Oprah for getting some people to read who probably wouldn't have done so without her prodding.

RAVEN0555@aol.com
At first I believed the question of an author objecting to what person or party promoted his or her book to be absurd. But then I began to wonder how I might feel if some extremist group found something they believed supported their cause in something I wrote, and then decided to promote it (my writings) in the direction of their cause. This would of course disturb me to a considerable extent. This is an exaggerated example, but suggests to me that, yes, indeed, an author does have the right (and perhaps obligation) to be concerned about who promotes his or her writings. I cannot really relate to objecting to being offended by having a book of mine having an "Oprah label", but everyone's standards are different.


MHorn10337@aol.com
An avid reader, I am always looking for recommended book selections.   Oprah, along with many other sources, has helped me find wonderful books to read.   A few of her choices I have not enjoyed, but that's the same with other recommendations. I don't think Mr. Franzen has read any of the books Oprah has recommended or he wouldn't have this major problem with her choices... or maybe it's just because her tastes are a little different from his. I am disappointed in Mr. Franzen in not wanting to be on the Oprah show.   Very few talk shows give authors the time they deserve to discuss their books.   I would have loved to have seen him on the Oprah show.   However, the controversy is overpowering his book much more than if he had left his opinion to himself.

I fear fewer people may read his book because of this. Which is too bad because Corrections is a wonderful book. I thought authors wrote to tell a story. If Mr. Franzen had not wanted to share his book with the public, he should have not gone for the big advance and royalties.   But I fear he would have been disappointed because his gem would have been discovered eventually whether it be Oprah or anyone else.   She just helps to share the joy of reading.

Natalia.Forrest@defence.gov.au
At first, I was put off by the Oprah tag (she is not as big here in Australia as in the US, but she is still big). But when I had read some books and only found out later that they had been Oprah selections, I lightened up. The books she chooses can be very challenging, and if having an Oprah seal of approval moves the masses to read good books, why not? I don't choose books based on if they are Oprah selections, but I don't let it bother me any more as well. On my shelves I have The Poisonwood Bible, House of Sand and Fog, and Paradise, and all have Oprah stickers. I think that Franzen is being a bit too precious - will he refuse to take the money that he has made by making the Oprah Book Club?

JCAMP2020@aol.com
Why write if you don't want people to read what you have put down?  Wasn't Harry Potter intended for children?  And just how many adults have read those?  An author doesn't "pick" his audience...they pick the book.

Caroline@swtexas.com
No, I do not believe authors should be concerned with who is reading or recommending their books.  People from all walks of life read all types of books and I think authors should be very happy that their books are being read regardless of who is recommending them.

Babyroses6124@aol.com
I think that an author should be happy that people are taking the time to give their books a second glance. Because sometimes there is no time and now it is very rare that a person can take a few minutes to read. I have given more time to bad books and I am always glad to read if a book has made a list. Thank you for your time.

LUCKEEJ@aol.com
I, for one, am totally turned off by any book that Oprah recommends.  I have yet to read one.  I guess I feel that I am smart enough to know what I want to read.  I do not like having a book urged on me, that I know I will not like to read. Which if I was an author, in regard to making money off their books I would think that having an endorsement would surely be for their benefit?  But who's to say that with refusing you garner more publicity and more sales too. I can't imagine a writer saying that he didn't want certain people to read his book.

genesisfan3@yahoo.com
I currently am a subscriber to your bookreporter newsletter that I receive regularly and I just finished reading my most recent e-mail from you guys and the posting about how author Jonathan Franzen was seemingly not too thrilled about being chosen for Oprah's current book club selection left me a little disturbed. Of course this is only my opinion but I think he should be extremely grateful that he has been chosen. Oprah never selects a book lightly and gives her selections a great deal of thought before she announces them and she reads more books than any of us knows. In a recent e-mail I received Mr. Franzen was quoted as saying that he was hoping to reach a large audience with this book. You can't get any more exposure than being selected for Oprah's book club! Kind of a contradiction no? I'm sure he would have had a large audience reading this book. It was good but not one of the best I've ever read. There are struggling authors out there who would give anything to be read and chosen by Oprah for her book club. Maybe he should say thank you or give a struggling author a chance someday. I'm sure these new authors would love to have his contacts! Just weighing in with my opinion. I love your newsletter and keep up the good work.

pat104@webtv.net
Think as cream rises to top of milk so will good books rise to the bestseller list. If an author writes as a hobby and has a private publisher, I guess he can sell /give to selected few. If he writes as an occupation then once published it is no longer his choice. Bet if the money quit coming he would not be so fussy (or do I really mean snobbish). LOL

Jenelle10@aol.com
He should be happy that anybody is reading his book.  How pompous!

ReadNgo@aol.com
Yes, authors have the right to be concerned with the readers and the person recommending their books.  Why, because a dedicated and conscientious author doesn't just write his or her book for the money and fame.   Authors that write for money are not the best writers.  The best writers are the ones that write for the love of the subject that they are writing about. These people should be respected for whatever the reason, to be concerned or not be concerned that their book be recommended and read by certain individuals.

Oprah is a very famous and intelligent woman.  She is not going to lose much by respecting the author's wishes not to let her promote his or her book. As for the author having concerns as to what type of person will read their book, the main reason I would agree to that is: if the content is explicit then an underage child should not read it.  From first hand experience I tried to buy Oprah's recommended books for a high school library.  This was not a good idea after reading the adult content in most of the books.  Perhaps the author didn't want to take a chance on their book being labled as a "banned book".

NMartin629@aol.com
I think that authors should be happy that ANYONE is reading their books and not worry about who is doing the reading.  In Franzen's eyes, he was trying to reach a certain kind of reader and that audience certainly was not the Oprah audience.  Why then did he accept her offer?  Money?  Publicity?  Who knows but the fact remains that he did accept it and with that acceptance went a few corporate necessities....having Oprah's logo appear on his book....making an appearance on her book club show....being ready to answer questions with his affiliation with Oprah during book signings and interviews.

So, Franzen makes the deal and sells his soul (in his eyes not mine).  He and his publisher will now make more money than they ever dreamed possible.  But, Franzen has concerns about the Oprah logo appearing on his book and the possibility of its turning away some of his more "literary" readers.  The publisher appeases him by continuing to print copies without the logo in addition to those with the logo.  But this is not enough for Franzen.  He has to make sure he disassociates himself further from Oprah by voicing his concerns not only about her logo but about her "schmaltzy," "koffee klochie" (sp?) audience as well.  Then he gets the NBA nomination.  Now there is no stopping him.  He makes sure everyone knows he really never wanted the Oprah nod.  How embarrassing not only to Oprah but to her loyal fans as well.  And, yes, she does have loyal fans.  I am one of them and I'm incensed at Mr. Franzen's attitude.  Of course, he has toned down his comments in the past week but I went back and read every interview he has given for the entire month and it's not pretty. I also had the opportunity to see him on Nightline three nights after the WTC attack.  Not only was he arrogant and smug, he also displayed a lack of confidence regarding our government, our president and our nation and was quite vocal about it.  I decided then and there to boycott his book even before it became an Oprah pick.  I wish I could get my hands on the transcripts from this appearance to show the entire United States what kind of a person he truly is.  He certainly doesn't deserve to be an Oprah pick and I'm not sure he deserves the freedom we are not fighting for.

SMEighmie@aol.com
I think the author of THE CORRECTIONS was being very much an elitist in his views of Oprah and her book club.  I have found her selections to have great depth and moral significance.  They are never the sugar coated romantic entertainment that many women find to their liking.  They require serious reflection to gain their full meaning. Jonathan Franzen is a literary snob of the worst kind.  His book is probably excellent but I know I won't waste my time on him and I am sure many others won't either.  Oprah treated him as she should by withdrawing her support without making any derogatory statements.  He should not be surprised if he is not marketable as an author from henceforth.  His publisher had extended the number of copies published because Oprah recommendation inflates the sales and now they will be stuck with many copies that will not sell.  It would not be a prudent business move to extend themselves for him again.  He may write because he has a love for words but it is the purchase of his books that will feed him and pay his bills.  Mr. Franzen owes Oprah an apology and should readjust his ego.

LittleAnnie44@aol.com
I think authors should be flattered that people take the time to read their books and make comments about them. That's what makes best sellers! If Jonathan Franzen doesn't want people to read his book why did he write it???  Better yet, why didn't he just keep it to himself? He sounds rather vain to me and authors need to relate to their readers. Go figure!

Dalkat@aol.com
J. Franzen's reaction to having an "Oprah Pick" sticker placed on his book seems the height of literary elitism. Did he write his book to be enjoyed--or simply to receive critical accolades? I think it's sad when writers (generally male) sneer at the Oprah crowd. And on a cynical note, how much more publicity did he receive when he made his anti-Oprah comments?

JLAntiques@aol.com
I assume this question has to do with Jonathan Franzen's snotty attitude toward being an Oprah book club selection.  I understand his being ambivalent because he considers himself a serious writer.  However, is it better to have your words read by only a few literary types -- maybe the reviewers for the National Book Award?  Or to have half a million extra people read your words and maybe be enlightened by them?  If a tree falls in the forest, etc. Franzen should be kissing Oprah's feet.  

DDuke60@aol.com
My stories are about life and people, therefore that's who I hope read and recommend them.

Torpie5@aol.com
I think it is the author's job to be aware of the writing, the craft, the language and let the work unfold with whatever audience finds it.

Rainbeau64@aol.com
It depends on the author's goal(s). Do they want their books to sell (making money for themselves) or do they want to be "snobs" in their choice of a reading audience?  Do they want only a select, elite group of people to be their readers?  Or do they prefer their books to "hit" a greater number of people? There are probably some musicians who can fit into either catagory, as well--ie. a large audience or a "select" few.

LUVBEAR65@aol.com
I think that an author should be happy that people are reading his/her book and should not be concerned about the audience.  I, myself, had bought The Corrections due to the fact that it was chosen by Oprah's book club.  I read the book halfway through and to me it was quite boring, so I had laid it aside and began reading other books.  I'm a faithful viewer of Oprah and when I heard that Jonathan did not want his book to have anything to do with Oprah, I was insulted.  

I believe that he has done himself great harm by his actions.  I know I will not finish his book and will NEVER buy another book written by him.  Oprah has done an amazing job with her life and especially with her book club.  I believe she has reached out to the public and made reading an important factor in our lives.  I feel that Jonathan should have been honored that Oprah felt that strongly about his book.

CoolCJL@aol.com
It's so difficult for any author to find an audience. I don't think authors can pick and choose their readers. Do movie stars worry about the type of person watching their films? So why should writers be any different. Jonathan Franzen (author of The Corrections) came off looking like a pretentious jerk when he claimed to feel "conflicted" about being recommended by Oprah's Book Club. Oprah has done a lot to promote reading --- certainly more than Franzen has done. Authors should just be happy to find an audience.

Taybri7@aol.com
I THINK AN AUTHOR SHOULD BE HAPPY THAT SOMEONE, ANYONE, IS READING HIS BOOK.  IF HE WANTED TO STREAMLINE WHO CAN READ HIS BOOK AND WHO CAN'T HE SHOULD NOT HAVE HAD IT PUBLISHED AND KEPT IT TO HIMSELF.  WHAT A JERK!

EDMARYMOM@aol.com
I don't think authors should care who is reading their books. They should just be happy SOMEBODY is reading their book.  I won't read this guys book...he sounds like a snob!